| Who Knows Best (Interests)? The Case of Charlie Gard |
5 |
| THE TRANSMUTATION OF DEFERENCE IN MEDICINE: AN ETHICO-LEGAL PERSPECTIVE |
5 |
| NEW LEGAL LANDSCAPES: (RE)CONSTRUCTING THE BOUNDARIES OF MENTAL CAPACITY LAW |
4 |
| REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY AND DISCLOSURE OF HEALTH DATA |
4 |
| Will the Eu Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 Inhibit Critical Care Research? |
4 |
| COMPENSATING INJURY TO AUTONOMY IN ENGLISH NEGLIGENCE LAW: INCONSISTENT RECOGNITION |
3 |
| REGULATING CHILD SEX ROBOTS: RESTRICTION OR EXPERIMENTATION? |
3 |
| Informed Consent to Medical Treatment Post-Montgomery: Causation and Coincidence |
3 |
| Gross Negligence (Medical) Manslaughter and the Puzzling Implications of Negligent Ignorance: Rose v R [2017] EWCA Crim 1168 |
3 |
| LEGALLY HUMAN? 'NOVEL BEINGS' AND ENGLISH LAW |
2 |
| Interpretation of Unnatural Death' in Coronial Law: A Review of the English Legal Process of Decision Making, Statutory Interpretation, and Case Law: The Implications for Medical Cases and Coronial Consistency |
2 |
| PROTECTING ME FROM MY DIRECTIVE: ENSURING APPROPRIATE SAFEGUARDS FOR ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN DEMENTIA |
2 |
| REMOVING HARMFUL OPTIONS: THE LAW AND ETHICS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL SURROGACY |
2 |
| AUTONOMY, AFFINITY, AND THE ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES: ACB v THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD [2017] SGCA 20 AND SHAW v KOVAK [2017] EWCA Civ 1028 |
2 |
| A RIGHT TO ACCESS TO EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE: THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS PUSHES THE ENVELOPE |
2 |
| WHEN CAN THE CHILD SPEAK FOR HERSELF? THE LIMITS OF PARENTAL CONSENT IN DATA PROTECTION LAW FOR HEALTH RESEARCH |
2 |
| Problems of Control: Alcohol Dependence, Anorexia Nervosa, and the Flexible Interpretation of Mental Incapacity Tests |
2 |
| IDENTITY RIGHTS AND SENSITIVE ETHICAL QUESTIONS: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE REGULATION OF SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS |
1 |
| CRYONICS IN THE COURTROOM: WHICH INTERESTS? WHOSE INTERESTS? |
1 |
| BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT OF WARFIGHTERS AND THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF MILITARY MEDICAL PERSONNEL IN ARMED CONFLICT |
1 |
| Patient Information: To Share or Not to Share? |
1 |
| EVERYDAY CYBORGS: ON INTEGRATED PERSONS AND INTEGRATED GOODS |
1 |
| WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHOSE PATIENTS TRAVEL ABROAD FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTION? |
1 |
| IF THE PROBLEM PERSISTS, COME BACK TO SEE ME ....-AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES AGAINST GENERAL PRACTITIONERS |
1 |
| Prevention is Better than Cure, But who Foots the Bill? R (National AIDS Trust) v NHS England |
1 |
| RHETORIC AND REALITY: USER ENGAGEMENT AND HEALTH CARE REFORM IN ENGLAND |
1 |
| USING AND DISCLOSING CONFIDENTIAL PATIENT INFORMATION AND THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW: WHAT ARE THE INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS OF A VALID CONSENT? |
1 |
| DO HOSPITALS OWE A SO-CALLED 'NON-DELEGABLE' DUTY OF CARE TO THEIR PATIENTS? |
1 |
| LIMIT CASES: HOW AND WHY WE CAN AND SHOULD DECRIMINALISE HIV TRANSMISSION, EXPOSURE, AND NON-DISCLOSURE |
1 |
| ADOLESCENTS AND BODY MODIFICATION FOR GENDER IDENTITY EXPRESSION |
1 |
| AWAKE AND (ONLY JUST) AWARE ? A TYPOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND HOLISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR WITHDRAWING CLINICALLY ASSISTED NUTRITION AND HYDRATION IN THE MINIMALLY CONSCIOUS STATE |
1 |
| DID BIOETHICS MATTER? A HISTORY OF AUTONOMY, CONSENT, AND INTERSEX GENITAL SURGERY |
0 |
| THE MEDICO-LEGAL 'MAKING' OF 'THE TRANSGENDER CHILD' |
0 |
| EMERGENCIES AND EQUIVOCALITY UNDER THE INHERENT JURISDICTION: A LOCAL AUTHORITY v BF [2018] EWCA CIV 2962 AND SOUTHEND-ON-SEA BOROUGH COUNCIL v MEYERS [2019] EWHC 399 (FAM) |
0 |
| Interpreting Evidence of Torture |
0 |
| GRIMSTONE V EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST: (IT'S NOT) HIP TO BE SQUARE |
0 |
| THE AUSTRALASIAN APPROACH TO THE DEFINITION OF MENTAL DISORDER IN A MENTAL HEALTH ACT |
0 |
| THE PROBLEM OF UNENFORCEABLE SURROGACY CONTRACTS: CAN UNJUST ENRICHMENT PROVIDE A SOLUTION ? |
0 |
| Surrogacy and the ECtHR: Reflections on Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy |
0 |
| No Judge Required: M (By Her Litigation Friend, MRS B) v A Hospital; M (Withdrawal of Treatment: Need For Proceedings) (2017) EWCOP 19 |
0 |
| The Relationship between Autonomy and Adult Mental Capacity in the Law of England and Wales |
0 |
| Uninformed Reform: The Attempt to Abolish the Hospital Managers' Section 23 Discharge Power Under the Mental Health Act 1983 |
0 |
| TOO EXPENSIVE TO TREAT? NON-TREATMENT DECISIONS AT THE MARGINS OF VIABILITY |
0 |
| The Discriminatory Legal Barrier of Partner Consent in Victorian ART Law: EHT18 v Melbourne IVF |
0 |
| PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN WITH INTERSEX CONDITIONS FROM NONCONSENSUAL GENDER-CONFORMING MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS: THE VIEW FROM EUROPE |
0 |
| Oh What an Unholy Mesh! Diamond v Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWCA Civ 585 |
0 |
| WHO SHOULD WE BLAME FOR HEALTHCARE FAILINGS? LESSONS FROM THE FRENCH TAINTED BLOOD SCANDAL |
0 |
| THE EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF BIOETHICS IN THE UK |
0 |
| ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEDICAL ETHICS AND THE LAW |
0 |
| The Impatient Patient and the Unreceptive Receptionist: Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 |
0 |
