| The lessons of policy learning: types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies |
22 |
| Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs |
19 |
| Can experience be evidence? Craft knowledge and evidence-based policing |
15 |
| Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design |
14 |
| Why advocacy coalitions matter and practical insights about them |
14 |
| Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty |
11 |
| Creating public value through caring for place |
10 |
| Narratives as tools for influencing policy change |
9 |
| Rethinking wicked problems as political problems and policy problems |
8 |
| Practical lessons from policy theories |
8 |
| The impact of conditionality on the welfare rights of EU migrants in the UK |
7 |
| Brokering behaviour change: the work of behavioural insights experts in government |
7 |
| The institutional work of creating and implementing Social Impact Bonds |
6 |
| Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? |
5 |
| Is it time to give up on evidence-based policy? Four answers |
5 |
| Policy design and the added-value of the institutional analysis development framework |
5 |
| Rhetoric and doctrines of policy over- and underreactions in times of crisis |
4 |
| Customer engagement in UK water regulation: towards a collaborative regulatory state? |
4 |
| Depoliticising austerity: narratives of the Portuguese debt crisis 2011-15 |
4 |
| Resistance or resignation to welfare reform? The activist politics for and against social citizenship |
4 |
| The effects of organisational features on media attention for public organisations |
4 |
| Governance, accountability and the role of public sector boards |
3 |
| Keeping expertise in its place: understanding arm's-length bodies as boundary organisations |
3 |
| Drawing practical lessons from punctuated equilibrium theory |
3 |
| Rethinking the role of experts and expertise in behavioural public policy |
3 |
| The use and abuse of participatory governance by populist governments |
3 |
| Indicators, agendas and streams: analysing the politics of preparedness |
3 |
| Austerity in the making: reconfiguring social policy through social impact bonds |
3 |
| Activating citizens in Dutch care reforms: framing new co-production roles and competences for citizens and professionals |
3 |
| Commercial investment in public-private partnerships: the impact of contract characteristics |
2 |
| The expertise of politicians and their role in epistemic communities |
2 |
| The impact of management consultants on public service efficiency |
2 |
| The effects of welfare state universalism on migrant integration |
2 |
| Political innovation, digitalisation and public participation in party politics |
2 |
| The impact of austerity on policy capacity in local government |
2 |
| Low-pay sectors, earnings mobility and economic policy in the UK |
2 |
| Local governance under austerity: hybrid organisations and hybrid officers |
2 |
| Practical prescriptions for governing fragmented governments |
2 |
| Meeting, talk and text: policy and politics in practice |
2 |
| The role of middle managers in the implementation of national public policy |
1 |
| Language revitalisation and social transformation: evaluating the language policy frameworks of sub-state governments in Wales and Scotland |
1 |
| The effects of privatisation on the equity of public services: evidence from China |
1 |
| Making policy information relevant to citizens: a model of deliberative mini-publics, applied to the Citizens' Initiative Review |
1 |
| Understanding reputational concerns within government agencies |
1 |
| Vertical epistemic communities in multilevel governance |
1 |
| Parliamentary petitions and public engagement: an empirical analysis of the role of e-petitions |
1 |
| Can meso-governments use metagovernance tools to tackle complex policy problems? |
1 |
| Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums: the emergence of reluctant individualism |
1 |
| Fracking in the UK and Switzerland: why differences in policymaking systems don't always produce different outputs and outcomes |
1 |
| The role of super interest groups in public policy diffusion |
1 |
