| EXPLICIT BIAS |
10 |
| CONSEQUENTIAL SEX: #METOO, MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, AND PRIVATE SEXUAL REGULATION |
7 |
| UNIFYING ORIGINAL INTENT AND ORIGINAL PUBLIC MEANING |
6 |
| GROUNDING ORIGINALISM |
6 |
| INNOVATING CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
6 |
| THE FUTILE FOURTH AMENDMENT: UNDERSTANDING POLICE EXCESSIVE FORCE DOCTRINE THROUGH AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF GRAHAM V-CONNOR |
4 |
| EDDIE MURPHY AND THE DANGERS OF COUNTERFACTUAL CAUSAL THINKING ABOUT DETECTING RACIAL DISCRIMINATION |
4 |
| RETHINKING POLICE RULEMAKING |
4 |
| TRACEABLE SHARES AND CORPORATE LAW |
3 |
| PROSECUTING IN THE SHADOW OF THE JURY |
3 |
| FOURTH AMENDMENT GLOSS |
3 |
| ORIGINALISM AND STRUCTURAL ARGUMENT |
3 |
| ORIGINALISM VERSUS LIVING CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE OF THE GREAT DEBATE |
3 |
| OUR TAXES ARE TOO DAMN HIGH: INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS, AND THE FAIR HOUSING ACT |
2 |
| SANCTUARIES AS EQUITABLE DELEGATION IN AN ERA OF MASS IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT |
2 |
| ORIGINALISM AND JAMES BRADLEY THAYER |
2 |
| THE STATUTORY INTERPRETATION MUDDLE |
2 |
| EQUAL PROTECTION AND WHITE SUPREMACY |
2 |
| CHALLENGING THE RHETORICAL GAG AND TRAP: REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITIES, RIGHTS, AND THE HELMS AMENDMENT |
2 |
| DEAL STRUCTURE |
2 |
| BANKRUPTCY'S CATHEDRAL: PROPERTY RULES, LIABILITY RULES, AND DISTRESS |
2 |
| A NEW STRATEGY FOR REGULATING ARBITRATION |
2 |
| ZOMBIE RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS |
2 |
| RECONCILING AGENCY FEE DOCTRINE, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE MODERN PUBLIC SECTOR UNION |
2 |
| MDL V. TRUMP: THE PUZZLE OF PUBLIC LAW IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION |
2 |
| SECTION 5'S FORGOTTEN YEARS: CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT BEFORE KATZENBACH V. MORGAN |
2 |
| JUDICIAL MISTAKES IN DISCOVERY |
2 |
| PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND AGGREGATION |
1 |
| ALIENATING CITIZENS |
1 |
| PRECEDENT AND CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE |
1 |
| THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S PIN: UNTANGLING FREE SPEECH REGULATION IN THE COURTROOM |
1 |
| LONE WOLF TERRORISM: TYPES, STRIPES, AND DOUBLE STANDARDS |
1 |
| ANTI-INNOVATION NORMS |
1 |
| DOES PATENTED INFORMATION PROMOTE THE PROGRESS OF TECHNOLOGY? |
1 |
| CONTRACT GOVERNANCE IN SMALL-WORLD NETWORKS: THE CASE OF THE MAGHRIBI TRADERS |
1 |
| THE TRANSGENDER MILITARY BAN: PRESERVATION OF DISCRIMINATION THROUGH TRANSFORMATION |
1 |
| WHO, WHAT, AND WHERE: A CASE FOR A MULTIFACTOR BALANCING TEST AS A SOLUTION TO ABUSE OF NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS |
1 |
| PASSIVE VOTER SUPPRESSION: CAMPAIGN MOBILIZATION AND THE EFFECTIVE DISFRANCHISEMENT OF THE POOR |
1 |
| FRAMING TRANS RIGHTS |
1 |
| IS THAT APPROPRIATE?: CLARIFYING THE IDEA'S FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION STANDARD POST-ENDREW F. |
1 |
| ORIGINALISM AND A FORGOTTEN CONFLICT OVER MARTIAL LAW |
1 |
| EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE CARCERAL STATE |
1 |
| BLIND JUSTICE: WHY THE COURT REFUSED TO ACCEPT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF DISCRIMINATORY PURPOSE IN MCCLESKEY V-KEMP-AND SOME PATHWAYS FOR CHANGE |
1 |
| COMBATING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED IN THE LABOR MARKET |
1 |
| WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU?: ADDRESSING MCCLESKEY V-KEMP EAS A FLAWED STANDARD FOR MEASURING THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RISK OF RACE BIAS |
1 |
| DIVERSITY ENTITLEMENT: DOES DIVERSITY-BENEFITS IDEOLOGY UNDERMINE INCLUSION? |
1 |
| FIELD NOTES FROM 1977-1991 |
1 |
| EYES WIDE OPEN: WHAT SOCIAL SCIENCE CAN TELL US ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT'S USE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE |
1 |
| PLAYING IT SAFE WITH EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE: SELECTIVE USE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE IN SUPREME COURT CASES ABOUT RACIAL JUSTICE AND MARRIAGE EQUALITY |
0 |
| HOUSING, HEALTHISM, AND THE HUD SMOKE-FREE POLICY |
0 |
