| DEVELOPING COMPETITION LAW FOR COLLUSION BY AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL AGENTS |
5 |
| ALGORITHMS, MACHINE LEARNING, AND COLLUSION |
3 |
| GOVERNING CHINA'S ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLIES UNDER THE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW: A TEN-YEAR REVIEW (2008-2018) AND BEYOND |
3 |
| JUDGING IN EUROPE: DO LEGAL TRADITIONS MATTER? |
2 |
| ON THE RELEVANT COST STANDARD FOR PRICE-COST TEST IN ABUSES OF DOMINANCE |
2 |
| BIG TECH BANKING |
2 |
| COMPETITION LAW AROUND THE WORLD FROM 1889 TO 2010: THE COMPETITION LAW INDEX |
2 |
| THE SMALLEST SALABLE PATENT PRACTICING UNIT AND COMPONENT LICENSING: WHY $1 IS NOT $1 |
1 |
| HOSPITAL MERGERS AND ANTITRUST IMMUNITY: THE ACQUISITION OF PALMYRA MEDICAL CENTER BY PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH |
1 |
| RE-CONCEPTUALIZING OBJECT' ANALYSIS UNDER ARTICLE 101 TFEU: THEORETICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES |
1 |
| THE CHICAGO SCHOOL AND THE FORMAL RULE OF LAW |
1 |
| PRIVATE ANTITRUST AT THE US INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION |
1 |
| DOES THE EUROPEAN DAMAGES DIRECTIVE MAKE CONSUMERS BETTER OFF? |
1 |
| APPLYING TWO-SIDED MARKETS THEORY: THE MASTERCARD AND AMERICAN EXPRESS DECISIONS |
1 |
| SCREENING FOR BID RIGGING-DOES IT WORK? |
1 |
| UNDERSTANDING GOOGLE'S SEARCH PLATFORM AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTITRUST ANALYSES |
0 |
| THE MORE ECONOMIC APPROACH TO PREDATORY PRICING |
0 |
| THE ROLE OF THE MAVERICK FIRM CONCEPT IN EUROPEAN COMMISSION MERGER DECISIONS |
0 |
| ASSESSING ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS: THE BOOKING.COM CASES |
0 |
| MOBILE PHONE REGULATION: THE EFFECTS OF PROHIBITING HANDSET BUNDLING IN FINLAND |
0 |
| ECONOMIC EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS: LESSONS FROM THE UK COMPETITION REGIME |
0 |
| INDUSTRY IMPACT OF CARTELS: EVIDENCE FROM THE STOCK MARKET |
0 |
| TRANSACTION VERSUS NON-TRANSACTION PLATFORMS: A FALSE DICHOTOMY IN TWO-SIDED MARKET DEFINITION |
0 |
| INDIRECT NETWORK EFFECTS, USAGE EXTERNALITIES, AND PLATFORM COMPETITION |
0 |
| THE CASE FOR LIMITING PRIVATE EXCESSIVE PRICING LITIGATION |
0 |
| HARMFUL SIGNALS: CARTEL PROHIBITION AND OLIGOPOLY THEORY IN THE AGE OF MACHINE LEARNING |
0 |
| COLLUSIVE ALGORITHMS AS MERE TOOLS, SUPER-TOOLS OR LEGAL PERSONS |
0 |
| PATENT ASSERTION ENTITIES AND EU COMPETITION LAW |
0 |
| THE EFFECTS OF BROADCASTING DIGITIZATION ON EU COMPETITION LAW: A TALE OF EU COPYRIGHT POLICIES |
0 |
| ESTIMATING DIVERSION RATIOS IN HOSPITAL MERGERS |
0 |
| DOES MERGER POLICY CONVERGE AFTER THE 2004 EUROPEAN UNION REFORM? |
0 |
| HORIZONTAL MERGERS AND INNOVATION |
0 |
| EVALUATING THE COMPETITION EFFECTS OF UBER'S ENTRY INTO THE BRAZILIAN INCUMBENT CAB-HAILING APP SEGMENT |
0 |
| THE FAILING FIRM DEFENSE-AN EQUITY-BASED APPROACH |
0 |
| ADVANCING QUALITY COMPETITION IN BIG DATA MARKETS |
0 |
| NO MAGIC DUST: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NATIONAL AND LOCAL ASSESSMENTS IN SAINSBURY' S/ASDA |
0 |
| DETECTING BID-RIGGING CARTELS WITH DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS |
0 |
| DATA SHARING IN IOT ECOSYSTEMS AND COMPETITION LAW: THE EXAMPLE OF CONNECTED CARS |
0 |
