| MONETIZING SHAME: MUGSHOTS, PRIVACY, AND THE RIGHT TO ACCESS |
3 |
| EVALUATING EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION: A CALL FOR BETTER EMPIRICAL RESEARCH |
2 |
| P(L)AYING TO WIN: LOOT BOXES, MICROTRANSACTION MONETIZATION, AND A PROPOSAL FOR SELF-REGULATION IN THE VIDEO GAME INDUSTRY |
1 |
| BOYCOTTING A BOYCOTT: A FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS OF NATIONWIDE ANTI-BOYCOTT LEGISLATION |
1 |
| THE INSTITUTIONS OF INNOCENCE REVIEW: A COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE |
1 |
| HOW CONCEPCION AND ITALIAN COLORS AFFECTED TERMS OF SERVICE CONTRACTS IN THE GIG ECONOMY |
1 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-DUE PROCESS-NEW MEXICO SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CRIMINAL ASSISTED SUICIDE STATUTE, DECLINES TO FIND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN AID IN DYING. MORRIS V-BRANDENBURG, 2016-NMSC- 376 P.3D 836 |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-DUE PROCESS-FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PROTECTS WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMANTS BY STRIKING DOWN THE LEGISLATURE'S RESTRICTIVE ATTORNEY'S FEE SCHEDULE. CASTELLANOS V-NEXT DOOR CO., 192 So. 3D 431 (FLA. 2016) |
0 |
| TORT REFORM-HOW THE PHRASE As HERETOFORE ENJOYED SUBJECTED WRONGFUL DEATH PLAINTIFFS TO NONECONOMIC DAMAGES CAPS IN MISSOURI, DODSON V. FERRARA, 491 SW3D 542 (Mo. 2016) (EN BANC) |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF CIVIL LITIGATION |
0 |
| STATE COURT PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS STATE CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES AFFECT ACCESS TO CIVIL JUSTICE |
0 |
| BABY NINTH AMENDMENTS SINCE 1860: THE UNENUMERATED RIGHTS AMERICANS REPEATEDLY WANT (AND JUDGES OFTEN DON'T) |
0 |
| RECOGNITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS FOR PENNSYLVANIA CITIZENS: PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION V-COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
0 |
| CREATIVITY OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?: EVALUATING THE DE MINIMIS EXCEPTION IN DIGITAL SAMPLING THROUGH VMG SALSOUL, LLC AND BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC. |
0 |
| FREE-MARKET FAILURE: THE WELLS FARGO ARBITRATION CLAUSE EXAMPLE |
0 |
| MURPHY OIL AND NORRIS LAGUARDIA TO THE RESCUE: PRESERVING EMPLOYEE RIGHTS TO CONCERTED DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN AN ERA OF MANDATORY INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION |
0 |
| ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT TO CORRECT THE LOWER COURT'S APPLICATION OF HILL'S PRIVACY TEST. LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 397 P.3D 1011 (CAL. 2017) |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EX POST FACTO-THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT PENNSYLVANIA'S NEW SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION LAW VIOLATES THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONS. COMMONWEALTH V. MUNIZ, 164 A.3D 1189 (PA. 2017) |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-HAWAI'I SECURES THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT-PROHIBITING THE SUBSTANTIVE USE OF PRE-ARREST SILENCE. STATE V. TSUJIMURA, 400 P.3D 500 (HAW. 2017). |
0 |
| WHAT FLORIDA'S CONSTITUTION REVISION COMMISSION CAN TEACH AND LEARN FROM THOSE OF OTHER STATES |
0 |
| REFUSING TO HEW TO THE FEDERAL FLOOR-FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FINDS MANDATORY WAITING PERIOD PRIOR TO ABORTION UNCONSTITUTIONAL. GAINESVILLE WOMAN CARE, LLC V. STATE, 210 SO. 3D 1243 (FLA. 2017) |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EDUCATION FINANCE-THE ONGOING BATTLE FOR ADEQUATE SCHOOL FUNDING IN THE STATE OF KANSAS. GANNON V. STATE, 390 P.3D 461 (KAN. 2017) |
0 |
| STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE AGE OF PARTY POLARIZATION |
0 |
| THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF DATA?: THE PROBLEM WITH RELYING ON COURTS WHEN MANAGING THE RISKS OF CLOUD SERVICES |
0 |
| THE CRIPPLING OF THE ANTI-TERRORISM ACT UNDER CURRENT GENERAL PERSONAL JURISDICTION |
0 |
| POKEMON GO, AUGMENTED REALITY GAMES, AND HOW THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY WILL HELP PROTECT A DISTRACTED SOCIETY FROM BECOMING EVEN MORE DISTRACTED |
0 |
| COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM AND FEDERAL TAKINGS AFTER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S BORDER WALL EXECUTIVE ORDER |
0 |
| STATUTORY REALISM: THE JURISPRUDENTIAL AMBIVALENCE OF INTERPRETIVE THEORY |
0 |
| KEEPING THE GARDEN IN THE GARDEN STATE: HOW NEW JERSEY FARMING LEGISLATION HAS FAILED TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT FARMING |
0 |
| DRIVING THE INDUSTRY CRAZY: CLASSIFYING RIDE-SHARE DRIVERS FOLLOWING DYNAMEX |
0 |
| WHO NEEDS LEGISLATORS? DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SEX WORKERS IS SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER TITLE VII |
0 |
| THIRD-PARTY STUDENT SURVEILLANCE: IS MONITORING STUDENT SPEECH GOING TO PREVENT THE NEXT SCHOOL SHOOTING? |
0 |
| STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS: CLAIMS FORGOTTEN, FORGIVEN, OR FOREGONE? |
0 |
| MAY A STREAM BECOME A TORRENT: ALASKA CREATES A ROADMAP FOR THE REFORM OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION DUE PROCESS LAW. YOUNG V-STATE, 374 P.3D 395 (ALASKA 2016) |
0 |
| IMPROVING HEALTH OUTCOMES AND LOWERING COSTS: ATTORNEYS AS PROACTIVE, PAID PROVIDERS TREATING SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH |
0 |
| BONE CRUSHER 2.0: THE FOURTH ANNUAL GREG LASTOWKA MEMORIAL LECTURE |
0 |
| TRI-PARENTING ON THE RISE: PAVING THE WAY FOR TRI-PARENTING FAMILIES TO RECEIVE LEGAL RECOGNITION THROUGH PRECONCEPTION AGREEMENTS |
0 |
| CONTINUING TO RESOLVE SURROGACY UNCERTAINTIES IN A POST-BABY M MODERNITY |
0 |
| THE REVIVAL OF A TWENTY-YEAR CIRCUIT SPLIT FEATURING A MEDICAL RESIDENCY PROGRAM TWIST: AN ANALYSIS OF DOE V. MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER & THE APPLICABILITY OF TITLE IX REMEDIES |
0 |
| NOTE: INDIVIDUALLY-FOCUSED DETERRENCE: A PROPOSED INCENTIVES-BASED NON-PROSECUTION STRATEGY FOR SECOND CHANCES AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL HURDLES |
0 |
| DISTURBING THE FINALITY OF A SENTENCE: HOW STATES WITH HIGH RATES OF JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE (JLWOP) RESPONDED TO MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA |
0 |
| VALIDATION AND VERIFICATION VIGNETTES: MORE RESULTS FROM AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CONSUMER UNDERSTANDING OF DEBT COLLECTION VALIDATION NOTICES |
0 |
| HOBBY LOBBY'S CONFLATED CORPORATE TAX EXEMPTION AND ITS IMPACT ON IRC 501(c)(3) |
0 |
| RIGHT TO LIFE: INTEREST-CONVERGENCE POLICING |
0 |
| A NEW GUARD AT THE COURTHOUSE DOOR: CORPORATE PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN COMPLEX LITIGATION AFTER THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION QUARTET |
0 |
| STILL LIVING AFTER FIFTY YEARS: A CENSUS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION OF 1968 |
0 |
| A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TURNER STANDARD AS APPLIED TO SOCIAL MEDIA SPEECH |
0 |
| WHEN RAPE CLAIMS BECOME CONTRACT DISPUTES: ADDRESSING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE AFTERMATH OF SEXUAL ASSAULT |
0 |
| RESCUING THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION |
0 |
| COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AS AN ANTIDOTE TO TUNNEL VISION IN CRIMINAL LAW REFORM: THE EXAMPLE OF COMPLICITY |
0 |
